复杂大系统动态可靠性与动态概率风险评估技术发展现状

陶俊勇;王勇;陈循

兵工学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11) : 1533-1539.

兵工学报 ›› 2009, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (11) : 1533-1539. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2009.11.024
综述

复杂大系统动态可靠性与动态概率风险评估技术发展现状

  • 陶俊勇,王勇,陈循
作者信息 +

A Survey of the Complex Large System Dynamic Reliability and Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment

  • TAO Jun-yong, WANG Yong, CHEN Xun
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

复杂大系统发生故障往往会造成巨大的经济损失,乃至恶劣的社会影响和重大人员伤亡,其可靠性与概率风险评估一直受到广泛关注。如何在复杂大系统可靠性与概率风险评估中综合考虑系统的动态行为对系统可靠性与风险性的影响成为近二十多年来研究的热点,并提出和发展了复杂大系统动态可靠性与动态概率风险评估的概念与方法,本文对其概念的定义,理论与技术内涵做了较全面的综述,介绍了目前几种典型的动态可靠性评估方法,以及该技术的应用情况,能为动态可靠性的研究提供借鉴和帮助。

Abstract

Complex large system failure often causes huge property loss, and even serious society influ?ence and heavy casualties, the reliability and risk assessment therefore have been widely concerned. In the context of reliability and probabilistic risk assessment of the complex large system, how to consider the influence of the system ’ s dynamic behavior on the system reliability and risk has been a hotspot over the past two decades, and evolved the concept of dynamic reliability and many methods. This pa?per reviewed the concept, the theory ana technology, furthermore introduced the main dynamic relia?bility assessment methods and their application, and provided some help for dynamic reliability study.

关键词

系统评估与可行性分析 / 复杂大系统 / 动态可靠性 / 动态概率风险性评估

Key words

analysis on system assessment and feasibility / complex large system / dynamic reliability assessment / dynamic probabilistic risk assessment

引用本文

导出引用
陶俊勇,王勇,陈循. 复杂大系统动态可靠性与动态概率风险评估技术发展现状. 兵工学报. 2009, 30(11): 1533-1539 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2009.11.024
TAO Jun-yong, WANG Yong, CHEN Xun. A Survey of the Complex Large System Dynamic Reliability and Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment. Acta Armamentarii. 2009, 30(11): 1533-1539 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2009.11.024

参考文献

[l] Cojazzi G. Ihe DYLAM approach for the dynamic reliability anal?ysis of systems[ j]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety,
1996,53(3): 279-296.?
[2] Devooght J. Dynamic reliability: the challenges ahead[C] //Fifth International Workshop on Dynamic Reliability: Future Direc?tions, Maryland : 1998.
[3] Siu N. Risk assessmait for dynamic-systemsan overview[ J ]. Relia?bility Engineering and System Safety, 1994,43(1) : 43-73.
[4] Chatelet E, Zio E,Pasquet S. The use of neural networks in the reliability analysis of dynamic systems: an overview [C] // Fifth International Workshop on Dynamic Reliability: Future Direc?tions, Maryland: 1998.
[5] Devooght J, Labeau P E. Theoretical basis of reliability problems [C]//Fifth International Workshop on Dynamic Reliability: Fu?ture Directions, Maryland: 1998.
[6] Seyed Hamed Nejad-Hosseinian. Automatic generation of general?ized event sequence diagrams for guiding simulation based dynamic probabilistic risk assessment of complex systems[D]. Maryland: University of Maryland, 2007.
[7] Devooght J,Smidts C. Probabilistic reactor dynamics-1 : the theory of continuous event trees[J]. Nuclear science and Engi?neering, 1992, 111(3): 229-240.
[8] Devooght J, Smidts C. Probabilistic reactor dynamics- Ⅲ . A framework for time-dependent interaction between operator and reactor during a transient involving human error[J]. Nuclear Sci?ence and Engineering, 1992,112(2) : 101 - 113.
[9] Smidts C. Probabilistic reactor dynamics-IV : an example of man/ machine interaction[J] . Nuclear Science and Engineering, 1992, 112(2): 114-126.
[10] Smidts C, Devooght J. Probabilistic reactor dynamics- H : a Monte Carlo study of a fast reactor transient [J].Nuclear Science and Engineering, 1992, 111(3): 241 — 256.
[11] Marseguerra M, Zio E, Devooght J, et al. A concept paper on dynamic reliability via Monte Carlo simulation[J]. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 1998,47 : 371 - 382.
[12] Labeau P E. A Monte Carlo estimation of the marginal distribu?tions in a problem of probabilistic dynamics[j]. Reliability Engi?neering and System Safety, 1996,52: 65 — 75.
[13] Tsunehiko Tanaka, Hiromitsu Kumamoto,Koichi Inoue. Monte しarlo evaluation of a dynamic reliability problem with an applica?tion to a case of partial cuts[ C]// Proceedings Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 1996,108 — 113.
[14] Hongzhou Wang, Hoang Pham. Reliability and optimal mainte- nance[M]. London: Springer-Verlag,2006.
[15] Dubi A. Analytic approach and Monte Carlo methods for realistic systems analysis[ J」.Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 1998,47(2-5): 243-269.
[16] Amendola A, Reina G. Event sequences and consequence spec?trum: a methodology for probabilistic transient analysis[J]. Nu?clear Science and Engineering, 1992, 77(3) : 297 - 315.
[17] Nivolianitou, Z, Amendola A. Reliability-analysis of chemical processes by the Dylam approach[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1986, 14(3): 163 — 182.
[18] Hsueh K S, Mosleh A. The development and application of the accident dynamic simulation for dynamic probabilistic risk assess?
ment of unclear power plants [ J ]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1996,52(3) ; 297 - 314.
[19] Chang Y H. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simu?lation of operating of operating crew response to complex system accident (ADS-IDACrew) [D]. Maryland: University of Mary?land, 1999.
[20] Labeau P E, Smidts C. Dynamic reliability: towards an inte?grated platform for probabilistic risk assessment [J] ? Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2000,68(3) : 219 — 254.
[21] Zhu Dongfeng. Integrating software behavior into dynamic prob?abilistic risk assessment [ D]. Maryland: University of Mary?land, 2005.
[22] Yunwei Hu. A guided simulation methodology for dynamic prob?abilistic risk assessment of complex systems[D]. Maryland: U- niversity of Maryland, 2005.
[23] Anjana Meel. Dynamic risk assessment of inherently safer chemi?cal processes : an accident precursor approach [D ] ? Maryland : Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 2007.
[24] Hong Xu. Dynamic event fault tree (DEFT) : a methodology for probabilistic risk assessment of computer-based systems [ D ]. Maryland : University of Virginia, 2008.
[25] Dugan, J. B. Automated-Analysis of Phased-Mission Reliability [J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 1991,40(1) : 45 - 55.
[26] Joanne Bechta Dugan, Salvatore J. Bavuso, Mark A. Boyd. Dy?namic Fault-Tree Models for Fault-Tolerant Computer Systems [J]. IEEE Transactions on reliability, 1992,41(3) : 363 — 377.
[27] Swaminathan S, Smidts C. The event sequence diagram frame?work for dynamic probabilistic risk assessment [ J ]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1999,63(1) : 73 — 90.
[28」 Swaminathan S,Smidts C. Identification of missing scenarios in ESDs using probabilistic dynamics [ J ]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1999,66(3) : 275 一 279.
[29] Swaminathan S,Smidts し.The mathematical formulation for the event sequence diagram framework [ J ]. Reliability Engineer?ing and System Safety, 1999, 65(2) : 103 — 118.
[30] Enrico Zio, Modeling process dynamics by recurrent neural net- works[C] // Dynamic PRA/PSA workshop, Maryland: 2007, 10: 22-23.
[31] Chatelet E, Chabot J L,Dutuit Y. Events representation in dy?namic reliability analysis using stochastic Petri Nets[C] // tifth International Workshop on Dynamic Reliability: Future Direc?tions, Maryland : 1998.
[32] Marseguerra M, Zio E. Nonlinear Monte Carlo reliability analy?sis with biasing towards top event [ J ] . Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1993, 40(1) : 31 - 42.
[33] Marseguerra M, Zio E. Biased Monte Carlo unavailability analy?sis for systems with time-dependent failure rates [j]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2002,76(1) : 11 — 17.
[34J Smidts C, Devooght J, Labeau P E. Dynamic reliability: future directions[C] // Proceedings of workshop on advanced topics in reliability and risk analysis, Maryland: 1998.

247

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/